<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZFS, Leopard and baseless speculation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation</link>
	<description>a bird to bring my message home</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dick Davies</title>
		<link>http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation#comment-3</guid>
		<description>@Stan : my guess is that 'OSX directory type' is going to be related to the directory hard links required to do Time Machine. But I just signed up to the Developer Program (so I can get read/write) and that means I have to keep quiet now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stan : my guess is that &#8216;OSX directory type&#8217; is going to be related to the directory hard links required to do Time Machine. But I just signed up to the Developer Program (so I can get read/write) and that means I have to keep quiet now <img src='http://number9.hellooperator.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation#comment-6</guid>
		<description>You can see a short summary of the zpool versions Leopard supports at the command line.  This is what my system shows with the ZFS 1.1 read/write kernel extension from the Apple Dev site:
&lt;pre&gt;
Rover:~ stan$ sudo zpool upgrade -v
This system is currently running ZFS version 6.

The following versions are supported:
VER  DESCRIPTION
---  --------------------------------------------------------
 1   Initial ZFS version
 2   Ditto blocks (replicated metadata)
 3   Hot spares and double parity RAID-Z
 4   zpool history
 5   Compression using the gzip algorithm
 6   bootfs pool property  and OSX directory type
For more information on a particular version, including supported releases, see:

&lt;a href="http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/N" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/N&lt;/a&gt;

Where 'N' is the version number.
&lt;/pre&gt;

Not sure what "OSX directory type" means, but it isn't listed on the ZFS version page.  It looks like Sun is already up to zpool version 9, so hopefully we'll see a Apple ZFS 1.2 kernel extension posted on the ADC in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see a short summary of the zpool versions Leopard supports at the command line.  This is what my system shows with the ZFS 1.1 read/write kernel extension from the Apple Dev site:</p>
<pre>
Rover:~ stan$ sudo zpool upgrade -v
This system is currently running ZFS version 6.

The following versions are supported:
VER  DESCRIPTION
---  --------------------------------------------------------
 1   Initial ZFS version
 2   Ditto blocks (replicated metadata)
 3   Hot spares and double parity RAID-Z
 4   zpool history
 5   Compression using the gzip algorithm
 6   bootfs pool property  and OSX directory type
For more information on a particular version, including supported releases, see:

<a href="http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/N" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/N</a>

Where 'N' is the version number.
</pre>
<p>Not sure what &#8220;OSX directory type&#8221; means, but it isn&#8217;t listed on the ZFS version page.  It looks like Sun is already up to zpool version 9, so hopefully we&#8217;ll see a Apple ZFS 1.2 kernel extension posted on the ADC in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://number9.hellooperator.net/articles/2007/11/09/zfs-leopard-and-baseless-speculation#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Take a look at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/6/ ZFS Pool Version 6 This page describes the feature available with version 6 of the ZFS on-disk format. This version includes support for the following feature: * 'bootfs' pool property This feature is available in: * Solaris Nevada Build 62 The related bugs for version 6 changes are as follows: * 4929890 ZFS Boot support for the x86 platform * 6479807 pools need properties</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/6/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/6/</a> ZFS Pool Version 6 This page describes the feature available with version 6 of the ZFS on-disk format. This version includes support for the following feature: * &#8216;bootfs&#8217; pool property This feature is available in: * Solaris Nevada Build 62 The related bugs for version 6 changes are as follows: * 4929890 ZFS Boot support for the x86 platform * 6479807 pools need properties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
